Hello everyone. Because
direction events have taken, I decided to move these accounts to see how much self-da. In principle it is an improvement, but I must admit that I will miss the bottom of notebook (I have tried to replace him currando the header) and "Queco" nervous, confused and hesitant. Also "Current Music" at first seemed like a hassle, but I finished to take her baby. These two things (Mood and Music), perhaps putting there continue, albeit at hand. About
you had me bound, take the time to update the link to the new address:
http://planetamundo.wordpress.com
Many thanks. The next guest
Thursday, February 8, 2007
Wednesday, February 7, 2007
Stomach Lines From Sitting Twelve chronic
(First things first: Two chronic often can lead to you to read this and you have not read and commented on Eleven. Do not let that happen. Thank you.)
If there is anything that distinguishes us from animals (you will have heard this phrase thousands of times, so there must be thousands of things that distinguish us from animals, but today I'm interested in this) is that we like to talk about things we do not know, which is stupid by definition, but how are you chronic just try that (to the new: on the stupidity that surrounds us, or rather, in which we are engaged, I have never excluded), for today I will talk about things that do not know.
I should clarify that if I do not know because I do not care. I have a theory that, for reportsTMLXC if not we free. This reminds me of psychologists favorite question: "If you could travel back and you will find Hitler at 5 years, did you kill?" But reformulated as "If you could travel back and you will find a Hitler to die , would you save? " I am always surprised that this question will generate debate, among other things because you do not specify what kind of universe you were (Universe, Multiverse, convergent, divergent, flat, curved, circular ...) or how many dimensions we travel in time, but ask a psychologist to know physics is like asking me who knows my psychology. They know what they want with that question. Back then, a person to answer that l perspective
If there is anything that distinguishes us from animals (you will have heard this phrase thousands of times, so there must be thousands of things that distinguish us from animals, but today I'm interested in this) is that we like to talk about things we do not know, which is stupid by definition, but how are you chronic just try that (to the new: on the stupidity that surrounds us, or rather, in which we are engaged, I have never excluded), for today I will talk about things that do not know.
I should clarify that if I do not know because I do not care. I have a theory that, for reportsTMLXC if not we free. This reminds me of psychologists favorite question: "If you could travel back and you will find Hitler at 5 years, did you kill?" But reformulated as "If you could travel back and you will find a Hitler to die , would you save? " I am always surprised that this question will generate debate, among other things because you do not specify what kind of universe you were (Universe, Multiverse, convergent, divergent, flat, curved, circular ...) or how many dimensions we travel in time, but ask a psychologist to know physics is like asking me who knows my psychology. They know what they want with that question. Back then, a person to answer that l perspective
Tuesday, February 6, 2007
Two Implantation Bleeding Twins
due out on April 2 on the news saying that the data is very troubling and are not working against drug plans, and returned to the sudoku on April 3, until they meet the following report with a little more data high and back again.
Those who truly are concerned about these figures, we will continue asking
What exactly are the plans that do not work? What is really being done to prevent these figures continue to rise?
Someone should tell them that their advice and all information that can be given in leaflets and brochures only serve to waste the paper, because those who do are at the head of the class B
)
PS: This chronicle qant to join:
"Stickers Tocapelotas" magazines
on Angel's blog
Communication Studies; "Ban Ban to educate or rather to educate?"
on video games in the 3000 Equal
and "This anti-educational television" on television blog
Efervescente2H Juanjo. basically about the same thing: opposing messages, who ignore the case of adolescents?
Those who truly are concerned about these figures, we will continue asking
What exactly are the plans that do not work? What is really being done to prevent these figures continue to rise?
Someone should tell them that their advice and all information that can be given in leaflets and brochures only serve to waste the paper, because those who do are at the head of the class B
)
PS: This chronicle qant to join:
"Stickers Tocapelotas" magazines
on Angel's blog
Communication Studies; "Ban Ban to educate or rather to educate?"
on video games in the 3000 Equal
and "This anti-educational television" on television blog
Efervescente2H Juanjo. basically about the same thing: opposing messages, who ignore the case of adolescents?
Saturday, January 6, 2007
Doujinshi Bulma X Vegeta Ten Chronicle
1) The
practical part consists of the following:
- Gather a bag of sugar in a kilo, metedlo in a shopping bag and left hand sujetadla extending his arm in front of you, more or less perpendicular to your body. I hope.
- If you do to another person, ask him how much weight is holding in his left arm without the bag, the weight is negligible compared to the kilo of sugar. If you are making, answer the question. Enter the result (or results) on paper.
- If all goes well, the (s) answer (s) annotated (s) should be A KILO. 2) This was the hard part. Now comes the easy
:
- Remove the bag andl kilo of sugar and leave it on a table (If no table, you can leave it on the floor, whatever)
- Close your left hand and arm extended perpendicular to your body again. You should be the same as before but without the bag in his hand. In that case, what you are doing well. If not, start over.
- Ask again how much weight you are holding in the left arm or answer the question, but without lowering the boom. - Now you can have several answers, in my experience, they are: "Nothing", "None", "Zero kilos" or similar.
3) Now comes the tedious part
:
- Ask him to your guinea pig to continue with his arm raised, horizontal to the body a little longer. Wait five minutI and a half hours (few cases require more than half an hour). At that time, the subject will ask lowering the boom. Until this happens, you should continue with an outstretched arm.
- When you ask permission to lower the arm, ask him why.
- This case also supports multiple solutions, but all are synonymous with "Because I'm tired." 4) The practical test is over. I hope you all had as well. We now turn to the theoretical phase
and
study results. The logical question is: "If you're not holding any weight, how do you get tired?". The answer, logically too, is: "And the arm, what?" Y hay es donde queríamos llegar y donde comienza la...
5) Practical Application
practical part consists of the following:
- Gather a bag of sugar in a kilo, metedlo in a shopping bag and left hand sujetadla extending his arm in front of you, more or less perpendicular to your body. I hope.
- If you do to another person, ask him how much weight is holding in his left arm without the bag, the weight is negligible compared to the kilo of sugar. If you are making, answer the question. Enter the result (or results) on paper.
- If all goes well, the (s) answer (s) annotated (s) should be A KILO. 2) This was the hard part. Now comes the easy
:
- Remove the bag andl kilo of sugar and leave it on a table (If no table, you can leave it on the floor, whatever)
- Close your left hand and arm extended perpendicular to your body again. You should be the same as before but without the bag in his hand. In that case, what you are doing well. If not, start over.
- Ask again how much weight you are holding in the left arm or answer the question, but without lowering the boom. - Now you can have several answers, in my experience, they are: "Nothing", "None", "Zero kilos" or similar.
3) Now comes the tedious part
:
- Ask him to your guinea pig to continue with his arm raised, horizontal to the body a little longer. Wait five minutI and a half hours (few cases require more than half an hour). At that time, the subject will ask lowering the boom. Until this happens, you should continue with an outstretched arm.
- When you ask permission to lower the arm, ask him why.
- This case also supports multiple solutions, but all are synonymous with "Because I'm tired." 4) The practical test is over. I hope you all had as well. We now turn to the theoretical phase
and
study results. The logical question is: "If you're not holding any weight, how do you get tired?". The answer, logically too, is: "And the arm, what?" Y hay es donde queríamos llegar y donde comienza la...
5) Practical Application
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)